Anglican Morning Devotion for 4 September 2021 Anno domini
A Anglican Orthodox Worldwide Communion Ministry

Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. 2And he killed James the brother of John with the sword. 3And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also.” (Acts 12:1-3 KJV)


Historical accounts of the reign of Herod inform us (Paley) that King Herod did not exercise supreme authority over Judea during the first thirty years of his reign; however, he did exercise that authority during the last three years during which time the Apostle James was martyred. James, in the providence of God, had served a great purpose in the church at Jerusalem, but there comes a time, decreed by God, when our circuit on this earth is finished. This was the case with James; however, it was not so with Peter for whom the Lord intervened powerfully to spare even by breaking the chains from Peter’s arms and legs and opening the iron-leaved gates of the prison. He had more work for Peter, but not for James. We often regret the death of a good man or woman of God in early age, but God’s Eyes see through the mist of time of future events that our mortal eyes cannot comprehend. “The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away – blessed be the Name of the Lord.” Regardless the length and span of our days, even if brief, our lives are yet a gift, therefore if a wealthy benefactor gives us $10,000 or one million, in each case it was a gift. We must be thankful for all life and not be displeased with the grace of God in shortening the life that He has granted.

Modern chief executives of nations are not the first to use ‘political correctness’ in aggrandizing their power over the citizens of a nation. Herod was no less ruthless in its use then those in Washington today, or Paris, or London, or Teheran. The Church in Jerusalem posed, in the mind of Herod (a jealous king) a threat to his rule. Though the Christian religion fosters a sense of honor and patriotism to the nation, even that influence is a thorn in the side of despots. They want no other voice but that of mammon to fall on the ears of their subjects; thus we have a ban on prayer in public places, exclusion of Bibles and even mention of it in our public schools, and an effort to force the consciences of Christians to support sinful and diabolical sins such as abortion and homosexual marriage with their own tax dollars. Any small compromise is as serious as a large one.

Did God have a purpose in allowing the martyrdom of the deacon Stephen? Though it seems a terrible fate in our eyes, the martyrdom of Stephen served to water the faith of the Church in tremendous ways. Had Stephen remained a deacon only, and served in preaching and teaching, he would have been remembered and honored to a far less extent than he has come to be remembered. Every Christian knows of Stephen and the manner of his courageous death. IT tells us that our best and finest may be the first to face such a fate as did Stephen. The same is true of the apostle James. He was dearly favored by the Lord and privileged in special was with his brother, John, and the apostle Peter. These three were privy to mysteries that the others may not have been able to either understand or brood.

The Church at Jerusalem had become a strong influence there. It wielded influence among many of Jerusalem. It may have been even influenced by the local politics of the city; and there was another problem with the Church at Jerusalem. Though it was needful to begin in Jerusalem and serve as a model and support for other churches to be formed, it had become almost like the See of Rome in the manner in which other Christians looked to it for guidance. So its purpose had been served as an avant garde in the early church movement, but now it needed to be pruned. James was the largest branch and the one needful to be taken out to serve the plan of the Lord to expand His Church to every nation and tongue. By the way, this is my sole interpretation based on my understanding of the history of the Church. That interpretation is not based on a direct scriptural evidence of the matter. I believe it was for this reason that the Lord allowed the martyrdom of James (which He could have cancelled) and disallowed that of Peter. Peter, as we learned in the baptism of Cornelius, was needed to carry the Gospel to borders beyond Judea and to the Gentiles rather than concentrating all ministerial efforts in Jerusalem. An Army needs a base camp from which to operate but, once greater territory is taken and the Army operates further and further away from its original base camp, others must be established in the formerly hostile land.

So King Herod saw that the beheading of James (by the sword) pleased those enemies of the Gospel in Jerusalem. So he immediately undertook to do the same to Peter. Amazing how nothing ever changes is it not? Planned Parenthood, the greatest and most gruesome enemy of innocent life is now the closest ally to big government against the Church. The political correctness of Herod’s day, and that of our own, is identical. It is designed to strike the fear of free expression into the hearts of its victims; and ultimately to void any First Amendment guarantees. The effect of the chief Apostle of Jerusalem being beheaded was sure warning to the lesser leadership and laity of Jerusalem. It dampened their testimony which is precisely the goal and purpose of Herod. We see the same kind of abuse in governments today.

By |2021-09-08T18:54:21+00:00September 8th, 2021|Blog|Comments Off on THE FIRST MARTYR OF THE CHURCH

About the Author: